Wednesday, August 6, 2025
Using DNA to Solve a 100-year-old Mystery
Let's meet Harold Ehrman. Harold was born in York, Pa. on 16 Oct 1894. He married Alice Goodling on 28 Jun 1913 in York. He did as required by law and registered for military service in 1917. Although we know that he was the father of a son born in July 1919, there is no record of Harold after his military registration although he was likely listed on the birth certificate in 1919. (The Pa. birth certificates for 1919 are not yet in the public domain.)
Since Pennsylvania did not mandate birth certificates until 1906, none is available for his birth. The records we can find include government records (census and registration) and newspaper articles (marriage and obituaries).
The first mention of Harold that can be found was on the 1900 census in York, Pa. He was listed as the son of Samuel and Isabella (Laumaster) Ehrman, age 5, born in Oct. 1894. Notably, his grandfather, Charles Augustus Laumaster, listed as Chas. A. and incorrectly labeled father instead of father-in-law, was also listed. So too, was his brother, Charles Augustus Ehrman, incorrectly listed as Chas. R. This name will play an important part later.
Harold can be found again on the 1910 census. Consistent with this date of birth of Oct. 1894, he was listed as 15 years old.
In March 1911, Harold's mother, Isabella died. He was one of the three children listed who survived her, "Katie, Harold, and Charles."
While we couldn't find documentation from the day, we found an article in The York Dispatch, 28 Jun 1923, titled "10 Years Ago Today." "Married - Harold H. Ehrman and Alice M. Goodling, both of York." Married, 28 Jun 1913. This establishes their marriage.
We also have a birth certificate for his first son, Harold Bernard Ehrman in 1914 where Harold was listed as the father. The name of the son was not filled in on the birth certificate. The question on age of the parents is off by one year for both Harold and Alice as he would have been 20, not 21 on his last birthday and she would have been 19, not 20. Perhaps it was phrased wrong when asked.
In November 1916, Harold was again listed in his father's obituary as surviving in York, Pa. And finally, the last documented record we can find is from 5 Jun 1917 when he signed his war registration card (WWI). He also claimed an exemption due to a wife and child dependants. And then Harold Ehrman disappeared.
Harold is not to be found in any subsequent census in York. And since he had a unique name, we can surely say that he was not found in any subsequent census anywhere in the country. If he died before 1972 in Pennsylvania (lived to be 78 years old or less) he would appear in the Pennsylvania Death Certificate collection. The York newspapers are pretty well indexed and no record of an obituary appears after 1917. Likewise, if he lived into the 1970s we would probably have a Social Security record and appear in the Social Security Death Index.
As a researcher of the Laumaster Family, my interest in Harold is as a son of Isabelle Laumaster. And for many years I could only show Harold as born in 1894. And a footnote, "disappeared around 1919."
Did Harold die around 1919 when he disappeared? How and why? Was he a John Doe whose body was found and never identified? Or perhaps murdered and his body was never found. I thought this would always remain an unsolved mystery.
Now let's meet Bobi Robert Evans, from Richmond, Va. Like we did with Harold Ehrman, we conducted a thorough document search. First, the documentation. His obituary was published in the Richmond News-Leader on 31 Mar 1950. Bobi Robert Evans died on 30 Mar 1950 in Richmond. His death certificate stated that he was born in York, Pa. on 16 Oct 1890.
Bobi died prior to the enumeration of the 1950 census so we do not have a census record for him on the 1950 census. The census took place on his street just one week after he died and his wife was listed as a widow. He registered for the World War II draft in 1942.
Note the claim of having been born in York on both his registration and on his death certificate.
Bobi appeared on the 1940 and 1930 censuses, both in Richmond.
The earliest record of Bobi Evans appears to be in a city directory for Richmond in 1921. He was living at 2217 E. Main St. and was listed as a cabinet maker.
On 21 Oct 1924, Miss Evalyn Carver Bowler married Bobbi Richard Evans of York, Pa. at her parents' home in Richmond.
And that is it. Bobi Richard Evans does not appear on the 1920 census in Richmond or in York. Or on the 1910 census. Or 1900 census. Nor does he have a WWI registration card.
Just like we did for Harold Ehrman, we now ask, "Who was Bobi Evans?"
LOTS OF COINCIDENCES
We now want to overlap these two records, those from Harold Ehrman and those from Bobi Evans. Harold has a history in York, Pa., presumably from birth in 1894 to his disappearance circa 1919. He has no records after age 23 (but likely age 25).
Bobi Richards has a history in Richmond, Va., from 1921 until his death in 1950. He has no records prior to age 31. While we are unsure if Harold Ehrman was alive after age 26, we know Bobi Richard was alive before age 31. But where was he? And who was he? We can find no records in Richmond or in York.
The World War I registration was required for all young men. The first phase was for ages 21-30 of which Harold Ehrman registered. The second phase was in 1918 for those just turning 21 in 1918. And the third phase was for those ages 18-45. While we have a registration for Harold, Bobi was in his mid 20s yet no registration can be found in his name.
EVEN MORE COINCIDENCES
Harold Ehrman was the son of Isabella Laumaster.
Bobi Evans was the son of Isabella Laumaster.
Harold Ehrman's father was Samuel Theodore Ehrman.
Bobi Evans' father was Charles A. Evans.
I have been told that in his family records he was listed as Charles Augustus Evans.
Harold Ehrman's brother was named Charles Augustus Ehrman. His grandfather was Charles Augustus Laumaster.
Harold Ehrman's WWI registration card listed his DOB as 10-16-1894.
Bobi Evans' WWII registration card listed his DOB as 10-16-1890.
While having a difference of four years, what are the chances they would both be born on October 16?
The parents of Harold Ehrman have been established earlier and we have included their obituaries. As for the parents of Bobi Evans: Isabella Laumaster was listed as his mother. I can definitely state that there has been one and only person who walked this earth named Isabella Laumaster. Her obituary is included but did not include a son named Bobi.
As for Bobi's father, Charles Augustus Evans, of York certainly around 1890, we can find no records of a Charles Augustus Evans or even a Charles A. Evans in York.
The coincidences of Harold Ehrman disappearing around 1920 followed by Bobi Evans first appearing around 1921 make us think that Harold and Bobi were one-in-the-same. As uncomfortable as it may be, we believe the documentation suggests that Harold Ehrman walked away from his family in York and started a new family in Richmond.
My discovery of Harold was no accident. That was simply following the family tree line of the Laumaster family, specifically that of Isabella Laumaster. I have confirmed with two descendants of Harold that they have no record of him dying but rather he just disappeared.
So how did I stumble upon Bobi Evans? That was an accident. Dumb luck? Good luck? Actually it may be a combination of both but was also genealogical research. In this case, DNA.
The good luck starts with my 5th cousinSarah. My recollection is that Sarah found me and wanted to know more about the Laumaster family. I asked her if she took a DNA test and she had. She uploaded her kit to GEDMATCH and I could see that she matched Doris, Sharon, Judy, Carol, and some others in our tree.
Sarah also had a question. She was a match to and had been contacted by someone who had an unknown match of a close family member in her tree. And Sarah put that woman in touch with me.
Out of respect for privacy I will not list any names. I will call her H24 as she comes from Harold Ehrman's line, the fourth generation. In other words, a great-grandaughter. H24 had been contacted by B23 as she comes from Bobi Evans' line, the third generation. In other words, a granddaughter of Bobi Evans. They were a "close match" in AncestryDNA but neither one seemed to know why.
H24 didn't know anything more than the family line about Harold, "he simply disappeared." But she added, "Maybe he left because I has a DNA match that doesn’t make sense."
I had some emails from H24 and two phone conversations. Some information she learned from B23 was thet B23 never talked about his family. He died in 1950 and his granddaughter, B23, was born in 1965. She never met her grandfather. The information she had either came from her father, Bobi Evans, Jr., or her grandmother, Evalyn Evans.
Bobi Evans Sr. stated that he was from York, Pa. but that he didn't remember any family. He stated that he orphaned at age 13, and he was sent to live with an aunt in Baltimore. He said a sister may have died too when his parents died. But when questioned about his York and family history he went silent - never wanting to talk about it.
H24 and B23 talked a little bit about their families. B23 had information on her dad and grandfather and said that some things didn’t make sense. Her dad and grandfather were both named Bobi Evans (Sr. and Jr.). She had discovered that her great-grandparents were Carl Augustus Evans and Isabella Laumaster. She found a historical record for Isabella but she was married to Samuel Ehrman.
The two women couldn't figure out their connection they both dropped it. The one correspondence from H24 I saw had B23 admitting she was so confused about not finding Bobi with Isabella on the old records and even stated, "Maybe everything we've always been told is a lie."
It was my dumb luck or good luck that led me to this connection. From there I could research Bobi Evans, Sr. and discovered he had no presence before 1921. He begged for me to research him. After all, he claimed Isabella Laumaster as his mother.
Once I had the documentation, previously presented, it was only left to prove this connection. H24 gave me some DNA connections between her and her mother to Bobi Jr. and B23. The shared DNA on all connections all pointed to one conclusion: Harold and Bobi Sr. were the same person.
However, all of them were in a range where there a slight possibility of a different relationship. So I kept looking. In my own DNA I could not find a connection to this family. Indeed, a 5th cousin connection only carried about a 10% chance of having shared DNA. But I checked my mother's kit and she has a connection to H13, a grandson of Harold Ehrman.
H13 has been very helpful in helping me prove the disappearance of his grandfather. He sent me a screenshot of his matches including one to Bobi Evans, Jr. They matched at 1033 cMs.
There are seven, and only seven, possible relationships between two people who share 1033 cMs of DNA: 1. Great-grandparent 2. Great-grandchild 3. Great-Uncle 4. Great-nephew 5. First Cousin 6. Half-uncle 7. Half-nephew
It must be noted that Ancestry.com cannot determine from 1033 cMs which of these seven would be the correct relationship. In 2021 it was not uncommon for Ancestry to pick what its algorithm determined to be most likely, FIRST COUSIN. I believe that today they simply used the label, CLOSE RELATIVE.
We have to eliminate some possibilities. With luck, actually the process of elimination, we hope for only one relationship to be possible.
Bobi Evans Jr. was born in 1933. H13 was born in 1951. It is impossible for them to share a great-grandparent/child relationship. We can eliminate the first two.
Great-uncle/nephew. To be the graat uncle of H13, Bobi Evans Jr. (1933) would have to be the brother of H13's grandfather, Harold Ehrman (1894). And to be a brother they would have to have the same parents. Harold's parents both died in the 1910s so this relationship can be eliminated.
First cousin. For this relationship, Bobi Evans Jr.'s father and H13's father, had to be brothers. Bobi Evans Sr. was born in 1890. H13's dad was born in 1914, the son of Harold Ehrman. The children of Harold Ehrman include H13's dad (1914). It could not include Bobi Evans Sr. (1890), who was born before Harold Ehrman, let alone Harold could not be the father of Bobi Sr. who was born before he was. Eliminate first cousin.
From the list of seven we are down to two. Before we explain this, let's look at 3500 cMs. If two people share 3500 cMs of DNA we know this is a parent-child relationship. But DNA can't tell who the parent is and who the child is. It just knows this is the relationship.
So we have a Half-Uncle or Half-Nephew. Or both, depending on which direction we start. The only remaining possibility from 1033 cMs of shared DNA that fits is the Half-Uncle/Nephew. It's Half-Uncle because Bobi Evans Jr. was a half-brother of H13's father. A half-brother because their father was the same person but they had different mothers. This is 100% proof that Harold Ehrman and Bobi Evans, Sr. were the same person.
While the documentation suggests that Harold Ehrman left his family in York circa 1919 and appeared as Bobi Evans in Richmond in 1921, the DNA connection between Bobi's son, Bobi Jr. and Harold's grandson, H13, proves this.
The truth is uncomfortable. For the family of Harold and Alice they have to process that their's grandfather's disappearance 100 years go was an abandonment. When I shared my findings with H24 they were not well accepted. Others in the family welcomed the truth, even while uncomfortable.
For Harold's Richmond family, it appears that they have yet to figure it out. When H24 suggested to B23 that perhaps they shared the same grandfather/great-grandfather, B23 replied that her grandfather was not that type of man. If they approach me I will tell the truth but I'm not seeking them out to destroy the reputation of their grandfather. They can believe what they want to believe.
But for the man who convinced his family that he was an orphan. For the man who honored his mother by naming her in his family history but made up a father's name based on his grandfather and brother's names. For this man we are reminded that people lie but DNA does not.
\——
SOME NOTES TO PONDER
In addition to a marriage record in 1924 between Bobi Evans and Evalyn Carter Bowling in the Richmond Dispatch, there was also a notice in the York, Pa., newspaper. "Bobi Evans of York" with no parents listed. I would assume that Evalyn was the driving force behind this, telling him they had to put a notice in the York paper. He must have cringed but gone along with it.
You don't disrespect your mother. Harold/Bobi listed his mother as Isabella Laumaster. But he took on a new surname. The name he listed for his father was Carl Augustus Evans, of which there was no person. In doing so he paid homage to his brother and grandfather, both of who were named Carl Augustus.
I cannot guess as to why he used the name Evans. His direct ancestors include Laumaster, Battorff, Ehrman, and Roush. Maybe it's a family name farther back, maybe a cousin name, maybe a friend's name, or maybe just made up.
Maybe nothing or maybe something. Harold Hastings Ehrman named his first born son after him: Harold Bernard Ehrman. Bobi Richard Evans named his "first" son after him: Bobi Roland Evans.
As far as the date of birth, one can only surmise if it was intentional to change the year of birth. While he used October 16, it is possible that his year of birth was simply not recorded correctly. Date of birth was not important at all in 1900 or even 1920. Perhaps it was only important to avoid draft registration. There wasn't yet Social Securirty and no computer recorded and trakced dates. It was not uncommon to find age creep in this generation, surprisingly, with many people believing or claming to be older than they really were. Simply stated, I am not convinced that Harold/Bobi willingly changed his year of birth to deceive anyone.
Alice Goodling, the first wife of Harold Ehrman, married William Clen Lewis around 1924. That begs the question, how did she address her first marriage? Did she have Harold declared dead? Did she file for a divorce (grounds: abandoment)?
On Ancestry.com I'm starting to see some people list Harold Ehrman's date of death of 30 March 1950. This appears to be lifted, in true Ancestry fashion, from one source, that of H13 who updated his grandfather's record to relfect his death.
On the Evans line, the user, B23, has a tree on Ancestry. She hasn't logged in in more than one year. The tree ends going back at Isabella Laumaster and Charles Evans. May she discover the truth someday. It's in the DNA. ...
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
Why Nathan and I Aren't Related (Even Though We Are)
Despite having 30 years of concentrated family history research, we are always learning new tips and techniques. My latest tool is using DNA.
I first took a DNA test years ago mostly to prove to my Irish "cousins" that my Sherry line does not come from Ireland, but from Germany. My research was correct and the DNA proved that. And then the results sat for years.
In the past 3-4 months I have learned to do other comparisons including comparison tests across other companies. I have spent years documenting the Laumaster Project and I met two willing cousins to compare results.
In York, Pa., in the early 19th century, were four Laumaster/Lowmaster brothers. Jacob (1781); John (1783); George (1786); and Charles "Carl" (1791). I have been in contact with cousins on all lines except for Charles' line to test our relationships.
Our initial DNA comparison was with Cece DeBolt (John), Sharon Tomes (Jacob) and me (George). None of us matched.
We were all taken aback but as I said "every test is a clue" (not realizing at the time that I was right) and we needed to gather the results of more tests. Ancestry DNA showed I matched some people who claimed the Laumaster/Lowmaster tree. These included some closer one, Beth Lutes and Bill Seger, and some farther out, Gary Wilson and Daniel George. And there were some unknown ones with screen names including gatorsag17. All I could identify appeared to be from the line of George.
But searching on Laumaster in AncestryDNA I found that I match Christine Leavitt from Jacob's line. This is important because absent multiple lines, this shows I am related to Sharon's line from Jacob.
Every test is a clue and I kept looking. Finally, Nathan Lowmaster took a test. This, I thought, would be low hanging fruit. Nathan uploaded his results to GEDMatch and I did a comparison.
I was stunned. We were not related.
Nathan had emailed me when he was 12 looking for information on the Lowmaster family. After receiving permission from his dad to have the conversation, we kept in contact over the last 16-17 years. I know his line. Hie great-grandfather, Rev. E. A. Lowmaster, and my grandfather, William T. Lowmaster, were second cousins.
Rev. Lowmaster's dad was Oscar. He and my great-grandfather, Thomas Lowmaster, were cousins. In 1998, we stopped in Lewistown, Pa. and visited Oscar's son, David. The only visual I took from that day was seeing a photo of Oscar and thinking how much he looked like my grandpa's brothers. The family resemblance was strong.
And yet, this test. This test said we were not related. My head started spinning. Crazy thoughts about my own ancestry dashed through my head but the most serious was I thought about blowing up 30 years of research because I had it all wrong.
Every test is a clue. And there were clues in there. Nate matched my 3rd cousin, Bill Seger. But very strangely, he matched Cece Debolt from the line of John. That didn't make sense to me.
How could Nate be related to Cece (and I didn't match her), but not to me? This did not make sense.
I studied. I read. I tried to get my hands on everything related to DNA testing. And I figured it out.
First, Nathan IS related to me even though he isn't. He is my 4th cousin, once removed (his dad and I are 4th cousins) even though we don't share DNA (except we do).
To understand this we have to understand how DNA is measured. And that is in units called centimorgans (or cM). Since the human race is made up of DNA, on some level we all share some common DNA by luck. If we used the threshold of 1 or 2 we are related to tens of thousands, probably millions, of people. Maybe to everybody.
The threshold units of centimorgans that testing companies use is seven. This generally eliminates showing test results that occur simply by luck. So Nathan and I do not share DNA at this threshold of sevens cMs. I was able to compare our DNA at 4.5 cM and we do share some DNA.
If I were to compare myself to the general population using 4.5 cMs as the threshold, there would be people I share with called "identical by luck." But Nathan and I do share some DNA not by luck. We are related.
I went into this thinking, and probably most readers do too, that if you are related you share DNA (above this threshold level of seven). And that is not the case.
First, if the DNA tests show you have common DNA, then you are related. Or most likely related. However, if the DNA tests do not show you have common DNA, it does not mean you are not related. Rather, it means you do not share common DNA above the seven centimorgan threshold.
This is true for more distant relationships. At first and second cousins, there is a 100% chance that cousins share some DNA. At 3rd cousins it is a 98% chance. And then it starts to drop.
At 4th cousins there is a 71% chance you share some DNA. So I could test against Nathan's dad Scott, a 4th cousin, and also in that line, Bill Lowmaster from Punxsutawney, his brother, Ben, and Christina Kensinger - all 4th cousins of mine. I should expect that three of those four I will share some DNA with but one of them I will not. We're still cousins - we just don't share some common DNA above the threshold level of seven cM.
At 5th cousins the chance of sharing DNA drops to 32%. So I suspect that being 4c1r, the chance of Nathan and I sharing DNA was about 50%. We may or we may not.
Cece and I are 5th cousins so we had a one in three chance of matching. It should not have come as a surprise when we did not match. But Nathan and her did match. They are 5c1r. At 6th cousins it drops to 11%. So they may have had a 20% chance of matching. And they did.
But assigning probabilities in this makes it much easier to see why Nathan and I did not match, even though we are cousins. The documentation remains vitally important. I'm not getting rid of 30 years of research. DNA can tell us who we are related to, but even if we don't match (probably at 4th cousins and distant), it does not mean we are not related, only that we don't share enough of the same DNA for one of these tests to show that we are. But we are.
I first took a DNA test years ago mostly to prove to my Irish "cousins" that my Sherry line does not come from Ireland, but from Germany. My research was correct and the DNA proved that. And then the results sat for years.
In the past 3-4 months I have learned to do other comparisons including comparison tests across other companies. I have spent years documenting the Laumaster Project and I met two willing cousins to compare results.
In York, Pa., in the early 19th century, were four Laumaster/Lowmaster brothers. Jacob (1781); John (1783); George (1786); and Charles "Carl" (1791). I have been in contact with cousins on all lines except for Charles' line to test our relationships.
Our initial DNA comparison was with Cece DeBolt (John), Sharon Tomes (Jacob) and me (George). None of us matched.
We were all taken aback but as I said "every test is a clue" (not realizing at the time that I was right) and we needed to gather the results of more tests. Ancestry DNA showed I matched some people who claimed the Laumaster/Lowmaster tree. These included some closer one, Beth Lutes and Bill Seger, and some farther out, Gary Wilson and Daniel George. And there were some unknown ones with screen names including gatorsag17. All I could identify appeared to be from the line of George.
But searching on Laumaster in AncestryDNA I found that I match Christine Leavitt from Jacob's line. This is important because absent multiple lines, this shows I am related to Sharon's line from Jacob.
Every test is a clue and I kept looking. Finally, Nathan Lowmaster took a test. This, I thought, would be low hanging fruit. Nathan uploaded his results to GEDMatch and I did a comparison.
I was stunned. We were not related.
Nathan had emailed me when he was 12 looking for information on the Lowmaster family. After receiving permission from his dad to have the conversation, we kept in contact over the last 16-17 years. I know his line. Hie great-grandfather, Rev. E. A. Lowmaster, and my grandfather, William T. Lowmaster, were second cousins.
Rev. Lowmaster's dad was Oscar. He and my great-grandfather, Thomas Lowmaster, were cousins. In 1998, we stopped in Lewistown, Pa. and visited Oscar's son, David. The only visual I took from that day was seeing a photo of Oscar and thinking how much he looked like my grandpa's brothers. The family resemblance was strong.
![]() |
| Oscar and Jean Lowmaster Credit: Christina Lowmaster Kensiger |
Every test is a clue. And there were clues in there. Nate matched my 3rd cousin, Bill Seger. But very strangely, he matched Cece Debolt from the line of John. That didn't make sense to me.
How could Nate be related to Cece (and I didn't match her), but not to me? This did not make sense.
I studied. I read. I tried to get my hands on everything related to DNA testing. And I figured it out.
First, Nathan IS related to me even though he isn't. He is my 4th cousin, once removed (his dad and I are 4th cousins) even though we don't share DNA (except we do).
To understand this we have to understand how DNA is measured. And that is in units called centimorgans (or cM). Since the human race is made up of DNA, on some level we all share some common DNA by luck. If we used the threshold of 1 or 2 we are related to tens of thousands, probably millions, of people. Maybe to everybody.
The threshold units of centimorgans that testing companies use is seven. This generally eliminates showing test results that occur simply by luck. So Nathan and I do not share DNA at this threshold of sevens cMs. I was able to compare our DNA at 4.5 cM and we do share some DNA.
If I were to compare myself to the general population using 4.5 cMs as the threshold, there would be people I share with called "identical by luck." But Nathan and I do share some DNA not by luck. We are related.
I went into this thinking, and probably most readers do too, that if you are related you share DNA (above this threshold level of seven). And that is not the case.
First, if the DNA tests show you have common DNA, then you are related. Or most likely related. However, if the DNA tests do not show you have common DNA, it does not mean you are not related. Rather, it means you do not share common DNA above the seven centimorgan threshold.
This is true for more distant relationships. At first and second cousins, there is a 100% chance that cousins share some DNA. At 3rd cousins it is a 98% chance. And then it starts to drop.
At 4th cousins there is a 71% chance you share some DNA. So I could test against Nathan's dad Scott, a 4th cousin, and also in that line, Bill Lowmaster from Punxsutawney, his brother, Ben, and Christina Kensinger - all 4th cousins of mine. I should expect that three of those four I will share some DNA with but one of them I will not. We're still cousins - we just don't share some common DNA above the threshold level of seven cM.
At 5th cousins the chance of sharing DNA drops to 32%. So I suspect that being 4c1r, the chance of Nathan and I sharing DNA was about 50%. We may or we may not.
Cece and I are 5th cousins so we had a one in three chance of matching. It should not have come as a surprise when we did not match. But Nathan and her did match. They are 5c1r. At 6th cousins it drops to 11%. So they may have had a 20% chance of matching. And they did.
But assigning probabilities in this makes it much easier to see why Nathan and I did not match, even though we are cousins. The documentation remains vitally important. I'm not getting rid of 30 years of research. DNA can tell us who we are related to, but even if we don't match (probably at 4th cousins and distant), it does not mean we are not related, only that we don't share enough of the same DNA for one of these tests to show that we are. But we are.
![]() |
| Source: Crista Cowan, The Barefoot Genealogist |
Sunday, October 29, 2017
Bessie Lowmaster Earl
Bessie Marie Lowmaster was born 25 Oct 1887, in Newark Twp., Licking Co., Ohio. Daughter of Charles J. and Nellie (Belt) Lowmaster.
She married Guy Hileman Earl on 17 Sep 1907.
Around 1910-11, they moved from Ohio to Elkhart, Indiana. They had two children: Nellie Olive and Harry G.
In 1930, Guy and Bessie were listed as married but living in separate households. Bessie lived with their son, Harry (he lived with her) whereas Guy was living with Nellie and her husband, Elmer Davis. They divorced 23 Jun 1930.
In 1933 Guy married Maude Bridenstine. I have found no record of Bessie since 1930.
FamilySearch.org lists her death as 11 Feb 1974 which I cannot locate a source. They also list Guy Earl's death as 11 Feb 1974. High doubtful both died the same day. At least a gravestone exists for him with the year 1974.
Most likely she remarried and her record is with a surname other than Earl. Or Lowmaster.
Looking for a definitive date of death.
She married Guy Hileman Earl on 17 Sep 1907.
Around 1910-11, they moved from Ohio to Elkhart, Indiana. They had two children: Nellie Olive and Harry G.
In 1930, Guy and Bessie were listed as married but living in separate households. Bessie lived with their son, Harry (he lived with her) whereas Guy was living with Nellie and her husband, Elmer Davis. They divorced 23 Jun 1930.
In 1933 Guy married Maude Bridenstine. I have found no record of Bessie since 1930.
FamilySearch.org lists her death as 11 Feb 1974 which I cannot locate a source. They also list Guy Earl's death as 11 Feb 1974. High doubtful both died the same day. At least a gravestone exists for him with the year 1974.
Most likely she remarried and her record is with a surname other than Earl. Or Lowmaster.
Looking for a definitive date of death.
Labels:
LOWMASTER
Wednesday, January 6, 2016
Valentine Long
Much of my information on the descendants of Magdalena Lowmaster (m. John Long) comes from Gary Wilson for which I am grateful. Whether Gary is the original source, I do not know, but much of this information can be found on genealogical sites. He may have shared his info with many others or he may not be the original source. It really doesn't matter.
One confusing record is that of Valentine Long. The records I received from Gary includes a Valentine Long as the son of Jeremiah Franklin and Rebecca Jane (Wagner) Long and a Valentine Long as the son of Samuel Lafayette and Lona (Sides) Long. Both were from the northern Cambria Co. or Green Twp., Indiana Co. area of Pennsylvania. These are townships that borders each other and there was much movement, continues to be a lot of movement, between the two areas. They are, in effect, almost interchangeable.
I have been unable to verify the existence of either Valentine Long. Perhaps some sleuthing in the county courthouses of Cambria or Indiana County will uncover something. But nothing on the Internet has helped. Nothing on Find a Grave.
Oh, and both Valentines were born in 1892 and died in 1893.
Let me start with the Valentine Long, the supposed son of Jeremiah Franklin and Rebecca Jane (Wagner) Long. Valentine was born in 1892 and died in 1893 (no months provided). J.F. and Rebecca were married late in the year (Sept.). Was Valentine born to them the same year? Before the married? A month or two after they married?
Also to be examined are the other children in the family born before 1900. There is Martha Jane (1894 although her obituary listed 1895 - 1968), Thomas Daniel (1896-1896); F.T. Long (1897-1974); Margaret Evaline (1897-1988); Cecelia Leeta (1900-1986).
The reason the children are important is the 1900 census record of Rebecca. Under number of births / number of living it was recorded as 5/4. Living were: Martha (Sep 1894): Florentine (Jan 1896); Evaline (Nov 1898); and Leta C (Jun 1900).
If Valentine (1892) and Daniel (1896) belong in this family, assuming no errors in the census record, it should have shown six births / four living. But it did not. It is also worth noting that I can find no verification for the record of Daniel either so I will concede that even if 5/4 is correct it is possible that Valentine was born to them but Daniel was not. But doubtful.
Finally, obituaries may lend a clue. Sadly, I have located but one, Martha. While she was the oldest of the children who lived to maturity and the first one to die, her obituary could have listed one or two brothers who preceded her. Instead, it only listed her husband and (presumed) parents.
The "second" Valentine Long came to me as the son of Samuel Lafayette and Lona (Sides) Long. Rather than just the year of birth and death, this one had months attached to it: Aug 1892 - Feb 1893.
This couple was married in Feb 1892, well within the window of the shotgun wedding time frame given that Valentine was born in August.
Again, look at the pre-1900 births: Daniel (1894-1982); Martha (1894-1972); Logan (1896-1968). The 1900 census for Lona listed four births and three children living. This is consistent with someone not listed and very well could be Valentine.
The obituaries I have located do not offer any more information. Logan's offered no information who the deceased while Margaret's listed her adults brother, Daniel, Logan, and Samuel. It doesn't mean there wasn't an infant brother, Valentine, especially one who died before any of them were born.
Until documented information surfaces, I will conclude that the "missing child" referred to on the 1900 census for Lona was Valentine and not for Rebecca Jane as that would make six births for her.
I welcome feedback and proof.
One confusing record is that of Valentine Long. The records I received from Gary includes a Valentine Long as the son of Jeremiah Franklin and Rebecca Jane (Wagner) Long and a Valentine Long as the son of Samuel Lafayette and Lona (Sides) Long. Both were from the northern Cambria Co. or Green Twp., Indiana Co. area of Pennsylvania. These are townships that borders each other and there was much movement, continues to be a lot of movement, between the two areas. They are, in effect, almost interchangeable.
I have been unable to verify the existence of either Valentine Long. Perhaps some sleuthing in the county courthouses of Cambria or Indiana County will uncover something. But nothing on the Internet has helped. Nothing on Find a Grave.
Oh, and both Valentines were born in 1892 and died in 1893.
Let me start with the Valentine Long, the supposed son of Jeremiah Franklin and Rebecca Jane (Wagner) Long. Valentine was born in 1892 and died in 1893 (no months provided). J.F. and Rebecca were married late in the year (Sept.). Was Valentine born to them the same year? Before the married? A month or two after they married?
Also to be examined are the other children in the family born before 1900. There is Martha Jane (1894 although her obituary listed 1895 - 1968), Thomas Daniel (1896-1896); F.T. Long (1897-1974); Margaret Evaline (1897-1988); Cecelia Leeta (1900-1986).
The reason the children are important is the 1900 census record of Rebecca. Under number of births / number of living it was recorded as 5/4. Living were: Martha (Sep 1894): Florentine (Jan 1896); Evaline (Nov 1898); and Leta C (Jun 1900).
If Valentine (1892) and Daniel (1896) belong in this family, assuming no errors in the census record, it should have shown six births / four living. But it did not. It is also worth noting that I can find no verification for the record of Daniel either so I will concede that even if 5/4 is correct it is possible that Valentine was born to them but Daniel was not. But doubtful.
Finally, obituaries may lend a clue. Sadly, I have located but one, Martha. While she was the oldest of the children who lived to maturity and the first one to die, her obituary could have listed one or two brothers who preceded her. Instead, it only listed her husband and (presumed) parents.
The "second" Valentine Long came to me as the son of Samuel Lafayette and Lona (Sides) Long. Rather than just the year of birth and death, this one had months attached to it: Aug 1892 - Feb 1893.
This couple was married in Feb 1892, well within the window of the shotgun wedding time frame given that Valentine was born in August.
Again, look at the pre-1900 births: Daniel (1894-1982); Martha (1894-1972); Logan (1896-1968). The 1900 census for Lona listed four births and three children living. This is consistent with someone not listed and very well could be Valentine.
The obituaries I have located do not offer any more information. Logan's offered no information who the deceased while Margaret's listed her adults brother, Daniel, Logan, and Samuel. It doesn't mean there wasn't an infant brother, Valentine, especially one who died before any of them were born.
Until documented information surfaces, I will conclude that the "missing child" referred to on the 1900 census for Lona was Valentine and not for Rebecca Jane as that would make six births for her.
I welcome feedback and proof.
Labels:
LAUMASTER,
Long,
LOWMASTER,
Valentine Long
Monday, March 30, 2015
The Marriage of Wayne
The Marriage of Wayne
There are some cases where the vital records just don't seem to support the facts as we know them. Certainly that is the case for Wayne.
To start, Wayne comes from a family whose name has evolved, and maybe is still evolving. It has been written as Friedly, Fredly, Friedley, and Fridley. Wayne Friedly apparently used a different spelling that his brothers, Charles and Walter Friedley, and maybe even his sister, Nadine Fredley.
Wayne's family seems straight forward enough. In his obituary (2009) he was survived by his wife, Sally, and four children. And when Sally died three years later (2012), she was survived by her four children and predeceased by her husband Wayne and her parents, Louis and Gracie Mae (Hendrix) Hafer.
So far, so good.
The kids were all born in Cincinnati in the early 60s. Or at least three of them were. Their birth records can be found in the Ohio Birth Index and for each, their mother is listed as Hafer.
Right family. Right?
But in Ohio divorce records we find a record in 1977 for Wayne E. Friedly (Wayne's middle name was Emery) divorced from Esther M. Friedly. She was living in Cincinnati while he was out of state (across the river in Kentucky?). In the record he was born in 1935 and we know he was born in April 1935. The marriage was dissolved after 21 years placing the marriage as 1956. All of that looks plausible.
Such a unique name, Wayne Friedly, and here it is in the public records for divorce. I am troubled by a couple of things here. First, is the name Esther. And second, under minor children, I would expect to see three or four but in the record it is listed as zero.
OK, maybe this isn't the same Wayne E. Friedly. Maybe there are two of them with the same spelling. And the same year of birth. And the same location.
As or Sally, the name Hafer was on the birth certificate of three kids for which we can find their records. So let's write this off that Sally and Wayne were married and had four kids as shown in their obituaries.
Oh, one more thing. I have a marriage record. It is of Wayne Emery Friedly and Sally Hafer. For 20 Aug 1977, just 12 days after he was divorced. Or someone was divorced.
If only that divorced record was for 21 days and not years, maybe Wayne and Sally were married, divorced, then he married Esther for a short time, divorced, and Wayne and Sally remarried.
There is too much here for me to figure out.
If anyone can help with the marriage of Wayne, please assist. This one is too strange for me.
There are some cases where the vital records just don't seem to support the facts as we know them. Certainly that is the case for Wayne.
To start, Wayne comes from a family whose name has evolved, and maybe is still evolving. It has been written as Friedly, Fredly, Friedley, and Fridley. Wayne Friedly apparently used a different spelling that his brothers, Charles and Walter Friedley, and maybe even his sister, Nadine Fredley.
Wayne's family seems straight forward enough. In his obituary (2009) he was survived by his wife, Sally, and four children. And when Sally died three years later (2012), she was survived by her four children and predeceased by her husband Wayne and her parents, Louis and Gracie Mae (Hendrix) Hafer.
So far, so good.
The kids were all born in Cincinnati in the early 60s. Or at least three of them were. Their birth records can be found in the Ohio Birth Index and for each, their mother is listed as Hafer.
Right family. Right?
But in Ohio divorce records we find a record in 1977 for Wayne E. Friedly (Wayne's middle name was Emery) divorced from Esther M. Friedly. She was living in Cincinnati while he was out of state (across the river in Kentucky?). In the record he was born in 1935 and we know he was born in April 1935. The marriage was dissolved after 21 years placing the marriage as 1956. All of that looks plausible.
Such a unique name, Wayne Friedly, and here it is in the public records for divorce. I am troubled by a couple of things here. First, is the name Esther. And second, under minor children, I would expect to see three or four but in the record it is listed as zero.
OK, maybe this isn't the same Wayne E. Friedly. Maybe there are two of them with the same spelling. And the same year of birth. And the same location.
As or Sally, the name Hafer was on the birth certificate of three kids for which we can find their records. So let's write this off that Sally and Wayne were married and had four kids as shown in their obituaries.
Oh, one more thing. I have a marriage record. It is of Wayne Emery Friedly and Sally Hafer. For 20 Aug 1977, just 12 days after he was divorced. Or someone was divorced.
There is too much here for me to figure out.
If anyone can help with the marriage of Wayne, please assist. This one is too strange for me.
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Finding Katie
Some cases are harder than others to solve. The mystery of Katie Hildebrand has been one of them. In my research, Katie first appeared on the 1900 census. Then she was the 12 year-old granddaughter of Isaiah and Libbie Lowmaster in Montgomery Twp., Wood Co., Ohio. Libbie was Mary Elizabeth Truett (Truit/Truitt).
In 1900 this Lowmaster family were the following members:
Isaiah Lowmaster 60, b. Mar 1840 Married 35yrs
Libbie Lowmaster 50, b. May 1850 Married 35yrs 6/4
Philma Lowmaster 33, b. May 1867 Single Son
Alvin Lowmaster 30, b. May 1870 Single Son
James Lowmaster 26, b. Feb 1874 Married Son
Martha Lowmaster 18, b. Apr 1881 Married 1/1 Dau-In-Law
Roy Lowmaster 0, b. May 1900 Single grandson
Katie Hildebrand 12, b. Jun 1887 Single Granddaughter
The death record we have for Isaiah Lowmaster (1911) listed his name as Lowmaster. However, this family also moved north across the border to Michigan and the children, at least some, eventually went by the name Lawmaster. Although even in 1940, James Lawmaster was listed as Lowmaster on the 1940 census. This is simply noted to point out that either Lowmaster or Lawmaster was used as the written name.
Libbie, as noted in the census, had six children, four of whom were living in 1900. Three of those children were living in the household: Filmore, Alvin, and James (with his wife, Martha).
The fourth child, Carrie May, was living, although I haven't found her on the 1900 census. She does surface on the 1910 census, in Toledo, wife of Edward Ball.
That leaves two of the six children unaccounted for based on Libbie's declaration of six children, four living. Thus both were deceased by 1900.
Historians know that the 1890 census was lost to a fire. Complicating matters is I cannot locate the 1880 census. The best I can do is jump back to the 1870 census where Eliza J. (Jane) is a four year-old, thus she was born around 1865/66. Brothers Filmore and Alvin are also on the 1870 census. Carrie was born in 1871 and James Alfred was born in 1874.
Finding Eliza J. accounts for five of the six children. The sixth one is lost to me.
I set out to find out about the granddaughter named Katie Hildebrand. She was living with her grandparents and could be the child of any of the children of Isaiah and Libby but likely one of the women. She would probably, but not necessarily, have the family name if she was the daughter of one of the men.
I know never to rule out something completely but Carrie had her own son, George Earl Kline, in October 1888, making it extremely doubtful, yet not impossible, that she was Katie's mother. My speculation was Katie's mother was Eliza J. or the missing child which I cannot locate.
I accept the most logical reason for Katie to be living with her grandparents is because her mother was deceased. This is another reason to rule out Carrie because Katie probably would be with her and not her grandparents if Carrie was her mother.
That missing child has long been out there as a wildcard. And it has always stalled my search.
In November I got a big break in a most unusual way. Geraldine Hansen, 87, died. She appeared to have gotten the most out of her life as evidenced by her obituary: "On November 13, 2014, Jerry received eternal rest. She was born on June 13, 1927 to Roland James and Iva Helen (Brewer) Bogart. Jerry (also known as 'Bogie') graduated from Oregon Clay High School and was voted Most Likely to Become a Famous Blues Singer. She then attended nursing school at Mercy Hospital in Toledo, Ohio and graduated with her Registered Nurse degree - in the days when nurses wore capes and starched their hats and wore white uniforms. She was a true Florence Nightingale."
Complete Obit Here
It is usual that obituaries usually mention survivors, occasionally mention the predeceased, but usually restrict that to parents, children, spouses, and siblings. Jerry's obit stated that in addition to those whom we might expect that she was predeceased by grandmother, Katherine Mae (Lawmaster) Brewer.
This was, hopefully, the big break that I have been waiting for although I did not recognize it as such. My first thought was there was a Lawmaster that somehow I missed in my tree. I searched the tree for Katherine Lawmaster or Katherine Brewer and did not have either. But having the name Brewer was a big clue.
I found an obituary listing for Katherine Brewer from the Toledo Blade. I requested a copy and was pretty disappointed when it came. There was so little information - I was really hoping it listed her parents.
But with the date of death, I could reverse search and I found a record in the Social Security Death Index for Katherine Brewer which matched the date of death. I then got her date of birth - 24 Jun 1887.
The only record I had of Katie was from the 1900 census. That census listed month/year of births although, anecdotally, it seems that the accuracy rate was about 80%. However, the younger the person the better the accuracy. And on the 1900 census Katie Hildebrand was listed as born in June 1887. A perfect match.
I was 100% sure I identified Katherine Lawmaster Brewer as Katie Hildebrand. Thus she was the granddaughter of Isaiah and Libbie Lowmaster (or Lawmaster). But that wasn't good enough. I needed the missing parent.
My search took me to Seth Brewer. I was able to locate a record for him and discovered his parents were Marvin and Josephine (Truitt) Brewer.
Now Truitt is not a very common name yet his mother and Katie's grandmother were both Truitt's. That raised my level of confidence that I had the right person to near 100%. They were surely neighbors. (And possibly distant cousins although I'll leave that for a Truitt researcher to prove or disprove.)
Katie Hildebrand and Seth Brewer were married on 6 April 1907 in Allen Co., Indiana. That's right across the Ohio border from Toledo. I'm not sure why an Ohio couple in 1907 would go to Indiana to get married but it may have had something to do with age of majority or the waiting period.
I found a marriage record for Katie. It listed her parents as Jacob Hildebrand and Liza Lowmaster.
Eliza Jane. And that's it.
Now we can write the story. It appears that Eliza and Jacob married. Or maybe they didn't. But by 1900 death had come to Eliza so Katie was living with her grandparents.
It was customary in that day for the kids to take on the family name of where they lived so to say it was Lawmaster (or Lowmaster) was not uncommon. Only for legal purposes, perhaps giving the name to the census taker or getting married, would she know her legal name, Hildebrand. I would not doubt that she was raised as Katie Lawmaster and perhaps, at marriage, was told her real name was Hildebrand.
If not for the beautiful writing of Jerry Hansen's life in her obituary, this link would have remained lost for much longer, perhaps forever. But I was able to link the names and the dates and now know where Katie fits into the family.
In 1900 this Lowmaster family were the following members:
Isaiah Lowmaster 60, b. Mar 1840 Married 35yrs
Libbie Lowmaster 50, b. May 1850 Married 35yrs 6/4
Philma Lowmaster 33, b. May 1867 Single Son
Alvin Lowmaster 30, b. May 1870 Single Son
James Lowmaster 26, b. Feb 1874 Married Son
Martha Lowmaster 18, b. Apr 1881 Married 1/1 Dau-In-Law
Roy Lowmaster 0, b. May 1900 Single grandson
Katie Hildebrand 12, b. Jun 1887 Single Granddaughter
The death record we have for Isaiah Lowmaster (1911) listed his name as Lowmaster. However, this family also moved north across the border to Michigan and the children, at least some, eventually went by the name Lawmaster. Although even in 1940, James Lawmaster was listed as Lowmaster on the 1940 census. This is simply noted to point out that either Lowmaster or Lawmaster was used as the written name.
Libbie, as noted in the census, had six children, four of whom were living in 1900. Three of those children were living in the household: Filmore, Alvin, and James (with his wife, Martha).
The fourth child, Carrie May, was living, although I haven't found her on the 1900 census. She does surface on the 1910 census, in Toledo, wife of Edward Ball.
That leaves two of the six children unaccounted for based on Libbie's declaration of six children, four living. Thus both were deceased by 1900.
Historians know that the 1890 census was lost to a fire. Complicating matters is I cannot locate the 1880 census. The best I can do is jump back to the 1870 census where Eliza J. (Jane) is a four year-old, thus she was born around 1865/66. Brothers Filmore and Alvin are also on the 1870 census. Carrie was born in 1871 and James Alfred was born in 1874.
Finding Eliza J. accounts for five of the six children. The sixth one is lost to me.
I set out to find out about the granddaughter named Katie Hildebrand. She was living with her grandparents and could be the child of any of the children of Isaiah and Libby but likely one of the women. She would probably, but not necessarily, have the family name if she was the daughter of one of the men.
I know never to rule out something completely but Carrie had her own son, George Earl Kline, in October 1888, making it extremely doubtful, yet not impossible, that she was Katie's mother. My speculation was Katie's mother was Eliza J. or the missing child which I cannot locate.
I accept the most logical reason for Katie to be living with her grandparents is because her mother was deceased. This is another reason to rule out Carrie because Katie probably would be with her and not her grandparents if Carrie was her mother.
That missing child has long been out there as a wildcard. And it has always stalled my search.
In November I got a big break in a most unusual way. Geraldine Hansen, 87, died. She appeared to have gotten the most out of her life as evidenced by her obituary: "On November 13, 2014, Jerry received eternal rest. She was born on June 13, 1927 to Roland James and Iva Helen (Brewer) Bogart. Jerry (also known as 'Bogie') graduated from Oregon Clay High School and was voted Most Likely to Become a Famous Blues Singer. She then attended nursing school at Mercy Hospital in Toledo, Ohio and graduated with her Registered Nurse degree - in the days when nurses wore capes and starched their hats and wore white uniforms. She was a true Florence Nightingale."
Complete Obit Here
It is usual that obituaries usually mention survivors, occasionally mention the predeceased, but usually restrict that to parents, children, spouses, and siblings. Jerry's obit stated that in addition to those whom we might expect that she was predeceased by grandmother, Katherine Mae (Lawmaster) Brewer.
This was, hopefully, the big break that I have been waiting for although I did not recognize it as such. My first thought was there was a Lawmaster that somehow I missed in my tree. I searched the tree for Katherine Lawmaster or Katherine Brewer and did not have either. But having the name Brewer was a big clue.
I found an obituary listing for Katherine Brewer from the Toledo Blade. I requested a copy and was pretty disappointed when it came. There was so little information - I was really hoping it listed her parents.
But with the date of death, I could reverse search and I found a record in the Social Security Death Index for Katherine Brewer which matched the date of death. I then got her date of birth - 24 Jun 1887.
The only record I had of Katie was from the 1900 census. That census listed month/year of births although, anecdotally, it seems that the accuracy rate was about 80%. However, the younger the person the better the accuracy. And on the 1900 census Katie Hildebrand was listed as born in June 1887. A perfect match.
I was 100% sure I identified Katherine Lawmaster Brewer as Katie Hildebrand. Thus she was the granddaughter of Isaiah and Libbie Lowmaster (or Lawmaster). But that wasn't good enough. I needed the missing parent.
My search took me to Seth Brewer. I was able to locate a record for him and discovered his parents were Marvin and Josephine (Truitt) Brewer.
Now Truitt is not a very common name yet his mother and Katie's grandmother were both Truitt's. That raised my level of confidence that I had the right person to near 100%. They were surely neighbors. (And possibly distant cousins although I'll leave that for a Truitt researcher to prove or disprove.)
Katie Hildebrand and Seth Brewer were married on 6 April 1907 in Allen Co., Indiana. That's right across the Ohio border from Toledo. I'm not sure why an Ohio couple in 1907 would go to Indiana to get married but it may have had something to do with age of majority or the waiting period.
I found a marriage record for Katie. It listed her parents as Jacob Hildebrand and Liza Lowmaster.
Eliza Jane. And that's it.
Now we can write the story. It appears that Eliza and Jacob married. Or maybe they didn't. But by 1900 death had come to Eliza so Katie was living with her grandparents.
It was customary in that day for the kids to take on the family name of where they lived so to say it was Lawmaster (or Lowmaster) was not uncommon. Only for legal purposes, perhaps giving the name to the census taker or getting married, would she know her legal name, Hildebrand. I would not doubt that she was raised as Katie Lawmaster and perhaps, at marriage, was told her real name was Hildebrand.
If not for the beautiful writing of Jerry Hansen's life in her obituary, this link would have remained lost for much longer, perhaps forever. But I was able to link the names and the dates and now know where Katie fits into the family.
Labels:
Hildebrand,
LAWMASTER,
LOWMASTER
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Goodbye LaRue
An obituary appeared in today's Pittsburgh Tribune-Review and I saw the Lowmaster name. But I didn't immediately recognize it.
"Eileen E. Davis, 76, of Derry, died Tuesday, April 10, 2012, at her home. She was born Sept. 11, 1935, in Altoona, a daughter of the late Robert L. Davis and LaRue Leidy Lowmaster Delozier."
Survivors were listed, including a sister, Helene Elliott, so I fired off a query to her. Much to my surprise, she responded almost immediately.
"My mother's foster parents were Lowmaster . They never adopted her because her biological Father would not permit them to. She always used their name even thou it was not official. Sorry I could not help with your family tree."
Wow. She helped. She really helped.
In 1930, 16 year old LaRue Lowmaster was listed as a daughter. But 10 years earlier she was 6 year old LaRue Leidy and listed as a boarder.
"Eileen E. Davis, 76, of Derry, died Tuesday, April 10, 2012, at her home. She was born Sept. 11, 1935, in Altoona, a daughter of the late Robert L. Davis and LaRue Leidy Lowmaster Delozier."
Survivors were listed, including a sister, Helene Elliott, so I fired off a query to her. Much to my surprise, she responded almost immediately.
"My mother's foster parents were Lowmaster . They never adopted her because her biological Father would not permit them to. She always used their name even thou it was not official. Sorry I could not help with your family tree."
Wow. She helped. She really helped.
In 1930, 16 year old LaRue Lowmaster was listed as a daughter. But 10 years earlier she was 6 year old LaRue Leidy and listed as a boarder.
Now I know that LaRue, in our family tree, does not belong. (Sad face). But I think I will list her with a note since the 1930 census will otherwise continue to create confusion.
Goodbye LaRue.
Labels:
LOWMASTER
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Turn in my Genealogist's Card
I am sick. My stomach is in knots. A few weeks ago I made a most uncomfortable phone call to inform a cousin that she has a brother she has never known. AWKWARD! But think about it - you're in your 30s or 40s. Or 50s. If you had a sibling you never knew about, would you want to be informed? By me?
As a genealogist I occasionally discover private information that some family members are not aware of. I have always held that it is not my place to inform others of this information. If the information has been withheld from family members it has been withheld for a reason. And I respect that.
For more than 20 years I have been entrusted to some family secrets and it has always been my intention to guard those secrets. Yet today, I am sick over something I did a few weeks ago.
Caught up in the spirit of the season, I acted too quickly without taking the time to check each fact and then check again.
Verify your sources.
This started when I was contacted by a cousin who had been contacted by a young man who was seeking his adoptive family. It's Christmas. My cousin told me that this young man lost contact with his family and wanted to reconnect. My cousin wondered if I knew the family and could help. Of course I could.
A Christmas family reunion danced in my head. How neat would it be to connect him back to his adoptive family?
Slow down. Check the facts. Check your sources.
I didn't do that.
While I would never give out the contact information of others to someone who happened to ask I am more than willing to pass on someone else's contact information to my family members. And so I contacted Susan.*
Susan is a distant cousin of mine and we have chatted on Facebook before. She comes from a blended family so I wasn't sure what she may have known about her brother. I would have contacted her parents myself but did not have their contact information.
I sent her a message and told her I would like to talk with her. We weren't able to talk right away but did tell her enough to really confuse her. I told her that her brother wanted to reconnect with her family.
She didn't know she had a brother.
Oh boy. What have I done?
A few days passed and I hoped that my message would be forgotten. I didn't know which way the road would take me but I knew I didn't want to go down it.
Then I was contacted by Brian.* He told me he was trying to reahc his family. I picked up the phone and called him and he told me a story that was different than my cousin told me. He wasn't adopted by Susan's family. He was given up for adoption by her family and now was knocking on doors seeking answers.
Brian had contacted his birth mother a few months ago and was told that his birth father was Susan's dad. Susan didn't know this. Heck, her dad may not of known this. And it may not be true.
While one may look at Brian and see some family resemblance, I'm not ready to accept that he belongs to Susan's family.
Brian is a mature adult. He comes looking for nothing except a sense of family. And a sense of history.
But I am ripped up inside that I contacted this family to tell them about Brian. First, it was that their adopted son has returned. And then when that wasn't the case, I had already "spilled the beans" and told them too much so I had to follow up with "Brian thinks your dad is his father."
While I could blame my cousin for providing me bad information, I don't. I know to check and double-check each source. I needed to talk to Brian myself before I initiated contact. I didn't do that.
As for Brian, I don't know what I want. I do want him to find answers and his family. It would be neat if he was part of mine but finding answers is most important.
As for Susan's family, maybe her dad fathered a child he never knew about. It happens. If he did, I hope they can come to some understanding of the situation. A Christmas miracle would be for them to accept Brian after all these years searching for answers.
And if he fathered a child he knew about and never wanted to be contacted then I really messed up. Now his family knows his secret.
Brian is knocking on doors. He will find the family with or without my help. In fact, he hasn't been told about them; they have been informed about him though. They have his contact information so they can contact him if they desire. But he is closing in.
I am hoping and praying for the best for this family. And I am hoping that I have learned a big lesson. And I think I need to turn in my genealogist's card. I really screwed up.
__
*Named changed to protect the guilty -- me
As a genealogist I occasionally discover private information that some family members are not aware of. I have always held that it is not my place to inform others of this information. If the information has been withheld from family members it has been withheld for a reason. And I respect that.
For more than 20 years I have been entrusted to some family secrets and it has always been my intention to guard those secrets. Yet today, I am sick over something I did a few weeks ago.
Caught up in the spirit of the season, I acted too quickly without taking the time to check each fact and then check again.
Verify your sources.
This started when I was contacted by a cousin who had been contacted by a young man who was seeking his adoptive family. It's Christmas. My cousin told me that this young man lost contact with his family and wanted to reconnect. My cousin wondered if I knew the family and could help. Of course I could.
A Christmas family reunion danced in my head. How neat would it be to connect him back to his adoptive family?
Slow down. Check the facts. Check your sources.
I didn't do that.
While I would never give out the contact information of others to someone who happened to ask I am more than willing to pass on someone else's contact information to my family members. And so I contacted Susan.*
Susan is a distant cousin of mine and we have chatted on Facebook before. She comes from a blended family so I wasn't sure what she may have known about her brother. I would have contacted her parents myself but did not have their contact information.
I sent her a message and told her I would like to talk with her. We weren't able to talk right away but did tell her enough to really confuse her. I told her that her brother wanted to reconnect with her family.
She didn't know she had a brother.
Oh boy. What have I done?
A few days passed and I hoped that my message would be forgotten. I didn't know which way the road would take me but I knew I didn't want to go down it.
Then I was contacted by Brian.* He told me he was trying to reahc his family. I picked up the phone and called him and he told me a story that was different than my cousin told me. He wasn't adopted by Susan's family. He was given up for adoption by her family and now was knocking on doors seeking answers.
Brian had contacted his birth mother a few months ago and was told that his birth father was Susan's dad. Susan didn't know this. Heck, her dad may not of known this. And it may not be true.
While one may look at Brian and see some family resemblance, I'm not ready to accept that he belongs to Susan's family.
Brian is a mature adult. He comes looking for nothing except a sense of family. And a sense of history.
But I am ripped up inside that I contacted this family to tell them about Brian. First, it was that their adopted son has returned. And then when that wasn't the case, I had already "spilled the beans" and told them too much so I had to follow up with "Brian thinks your dad is his father."
While I could blame my cousin for providing me bad information, I don't. I know to check and double-check each source. I needed to talk to Brian myself before I initiated contact. I didn't do that.
As for Brian, I don't know what I want. I do want him to find answers and his family. It would be neat if he was part of mine but finding answers is most important.
As for Susan's family, maybe her dad fathered a child he never knew about. It happens. If he did, I hope they can come to some understanding of the situation. A Christmas miracle would be for them to accept Brian after all these years searching for answers.
And if he fathered a child he knew about and never wanted to be contacted then I really messed up. Now his family knows his secret.
Brian is knocking on doors. He will find the family with or without my help. In fact, he hasn't been told about them; they have been informed about him though. They have his contact information so they can contact him if they desire. But he is closing in.
I am hoping and praying for the best for this family. And I am hoping that I have learned a big lesson. And I think I need to turn in my genealogist's card. I really screwed up.
__
*Named changed to protect the guilty -- me
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Spelling Counts
I have worked for more than 20 years connecting the dots between everyone named Lowmaster, Lawmaster, and Loumaster. Usually when I come across a historical record I can connect the person or dismiss it as an error.
I came upon a grave site record of Paul Lowmaster, 1905-1967. This was in the Anderson Cemetery in Anderson, Missouri, the resting place of William D. (1846-1940) and Lavina C. Lowmaster (1853-1940).
But Paul didn't fit into any of my historical records. I double checked William D's family and it didn't make sense that we, and the census takers, missed Paul.
Although there was a record of Paul, there was no grave stone photo. So I wrote the researcher and asked if she had a photo of the grave. I figured it would be a long shot because I figured if she had one she would have uploaded it. Unless she didn't own" the photo and just wanted to upload the info.
I wrote and she responded -- with a photo.

Hmmm. I suppose one could assume that Lomaster is really Lowmaster. Or maybe not.
I don't know who Paul is but don't believe he fits into the Lowmaster family. He may have been the only one to use the name because the Social Security Death Index nor a search on WhitePages.com returns anyone named Lomaster. I do know that there is a death record in the state of Oregon for Paul and that he served in World War II -- not WWI as indicated above.
But not our Paul.
I came upon a grave site record of Paul Lowmaster, 1905-1967. This was in the Anderson Cemetery in Anderson, Missouri, the resting place of William D. (1846-1940) and Lavina C. Lowmaster (1853-1940).
But Paul didn't fit into any of my historical records. I double checked William D's family and it didn't make sense that we, and the census takers, missed Paul.
Although there was a record of Paul, there was no grave stone photo. So I wrote the researcher and asked if she had a photo of the grave. I figured it would be a long shot because I figured if she had one she would have uploaded it. Unless she didn't own" the photo and just wanted to upload the info.
I wrote and she responded -- with a photo.

Hmmm. I suppose one could assume that Lomaster is really Lowmaster. Or maybe not.
I don't know who Paul is but don't believe he fits into the Lowmaster family. He may have been the only one to use the name because the Social Security Death Index nor a search on WhitePages.com returns anyone named Lomaster. I do know that there is a death record in the state of Oregon for Paul and that he served in World War II -- not WWI as indicated above.
But not our Paul.
Labels:
LOWMASTER
Thursday, May 7, 2009
Research Suspended
Hello Family and Friends,
While I am always an active researcher, I am more active at times than others. Basically, I shut down all research from April through December as I spend my time cycling, refereeing soccer, assigning and teaching refereeing as well.
I will try my best to be responsive to your questions but will re-surface in January. :)
Barry
While I am always an active researcher, I am more active at times than others. Basically, I shut down all research from April through December as I spend my time cycling, refereeing soccer, assigning and teaching refereeing as well.
I will try my best to be responsive to your questions but will re-surface in January. :)
Barry
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Daniel Laumaster
1858 Death notice of Daniel Laumeister
Rev. Daniel Laumaster departed this life January the 19th, 1858, aged 36 years and 7 days.
We know little about Rev. Laumaster/Lowmaster. Born in 1822, he was not listed on the census of 1830 and 1840 since only the head of household was listed. This researcher has not been able to find him on the 1850 census. He was not living in the household of George and Magdalena Lowmaster.
The records of the children born early to this family are well documented in the York, Pa. church records. The later children were documented through family histories and newspaper articles. But Daniel had no such benefit. No news article of the day has been found and he left no family or descendants to carry on his story.
For years, I have been reluctant to list Daniel with this family. But the evidence of the days calls for it.
Census records in 1830 and 1840 lists three boys in the 5-10 then 15-20 age range. We know of George, Jr., and Jacob. There must be a third and Daniel would be it.
Rev. Vane Lowmaster, historian, lists Daniel in this family. Despite the fact that Vane did not list his source for this information, it stands to reason that he was right.
Daniel Lowmaster died at the age of 34 years. He is buried in the family plot at Fairview Church Cemetery and the grave is marked by a tall slim sandstone marker that was cut from native sandstone, probably by a local stonemason.
Vane most certainly relied on family records, probably contained in the family Bible. If one visits Fairview Cemetery, Canoe Twp., Indiana Co., Pa. one will find the marker Vane referenced. But the name Daniel is not on it. It is simply inscribed D. L. Lowmaster. Thus it is clear that Vane didn't simply go to the cemetery and decide who belonged in which family. He relied on other records.
Brother L embraced religion when quite young and joined the church of the United Brethren in Christ. In January, 1857, he joined the Allegheny Conference, and was appointed to the Stone Valley Circuit. He was re-appointed to the Stone Valley Circuit; but wishing to see his friends, he went home from conference. He arrived there on Tuesday, felt unwell, and on Thursday following he took his bed, and on the next Tuesday his spirit took its flight for higher climes. Disease was small-pox.
Our last clue was that "Brother L. was a single man and owned property near his father's residence, in Indiana county, Pa., where he died."
George Lowmaster, Sr., was the only Lowmaster/Laumaster living in Indiana Co., in 1858 old enough to have a son Daniel's age.
Still, there is one question that remains unresolved. Jacob Lowmaster, Daniel's brother, moved to Missouri where he lived his adult life. His gravestone is marked 1822-1878.
While there was time for Daniel to be born in January, 1822, and have a sibling born in November or December, that is doubtful. Could have they been twins? There were another set of twins in the family. Or it is possible that in all this a date could be off by one year.
Rev. Daniel Laumaster departed this life January the 19th, 1858, aged 36 years and 7 days.
We know little about Rev. Laumaster/Lowmaster. Born in 1822, he was not listed on the census of 1830 and 1840 since only the head of household was listed. This researcher has not been able to find him on the 1850 census. He was not living in the household of George and Magdalena Lowmaster.
The records of the children born early to this family are well documented in the York, Pa. church records. The later children were documented through family histories and newspaper articles. But Daniel had no such benefit. No news article of the day has been found and he left no family or descendants to carry on his story.
For years, I have been reluctant to list Daniel with this family. But the evidence of the days calls for it.
Census records in 1830 and 1840 lists three boys in the 5-10 then 15-20 age range. We know of George, Jr., and Jacob. There must be a third and Daniel would be it.
Rev. Vane Lowmaster, historian, lists Daniel in this family. Despite the fact that Vane did not list his source for this information, it stands to reason that he was right.
Daniel Lowmaster died at the age of 34 years. He is buried in the family plot at Fairview Church Cemetery and the grave is marked by a tall slim sandstone marker that was cut from native sandstone, probably by a local stonemason.
Vane most certainly relied on family records, probably contained in the family Bible. If one visits Fairview Cemetery, Canoe Twp., Indiana Co., Pa. one will find the marker Vane referenced. But the name Daniel is not on it. It is simply inscribed D. L. Lowmaster. Thus it is clear that Vane didn't simply go to the cemetery and decide who belonged in which family. He relied on other records.
Brother L embraced religion when quite young and joined the church of the United Brethren in Christ. In January, 1857, he joined the Allegheny Conference, and was appointed to the Stone Valley Circuit. He was re-appointed to the Stone Valley Circuit; but wishing to see his friends, he went home from conference. He arrived there on Tuesday, felt unwell, and on Thursday following he took his bed, and on the next Tuesday his spirit took its flight for higher climes. Disease was small-pox.
Our last clue was that "Brother L. was a single man and owned property near his father's residence, in Indiana county, Pa., where he died."
George Lowmaster, Sr., was the only Lowmaster/Laumaster living in Indiana Co., in 1858 old enough to have a son Daniel's age.
Still, there is one question that remains unresolved. Jacob Lowmaster, Daniel's brother, moved to Missouri where he lived his adult life. His gravestone is marked 1822-1878.
While there was time for Daniel to be born in January, 1822, and have a sibling born in November or December, that is doubtful. Could have they been twins? There were another set of twins in the family. Or it is possible that in all this a date could be off by one year.
Monday, March 23, 2009
The Lowmaster Book
I am deeply indebted to my great-uncle, Rev. Vane Henry Lowmaster (1892-1987) for printing a Lowmaster history in 1972. I looked at the crisp pages of my copy, still only 37 years old, and wondered how best to preserve this. And I decided the best way was to unbind it and create a digital copy and share it with others.
Vane did not have at his disposal the resources I have had. His work, outstanding in its day, formed the basis of all that I did.
He referenced the Historical Society of York, Pa. when he wrote: "It seems certain that most, if not all, of the Lowmasters of America are descended from this single immigrant, Wendel Lawmeister (Lowmaster); and until 1875, practically all of them lived in York, County, Pa."
Vane then added his own note: "The above date is not entirely correct. Some of them left York much earlier. One went to Richmond, Virginia, and a descendant left two daughters. One is reported to have gone to Ohio. John Lowmaster bought his farm in what is now Canoe Township, Indiana County, in 1845."
Vane made no reference to paternal descendants who go by the names Lawmaster, Laumaster, and Loumaster. His focus was on his family, that is, his father and grandfather, as well as his maternal side, the Emericks.
This work was an excellent start for this researcher. It contained a number of ambiguities, for which I am thankful, because it has forced me to search for more and check and double check his sources. And he has still left a lot to ponder as I have yet to explore his statement that "Legend says his (Wendel's) wife was of the House of Von Beulow."
Lowmaster, 1972, by Rev. Vane Lowmaster
Vane did not have at his disposal the resources I have had. His work, outstanding in its day, formed the basis of all that I did.
He referenced the Historical Society of York, Pa. when he wrote: "It seems certain that most, if not all, of the Lowmasters of America are descended from this single immigrant, Wendel Lawmeister (Lowmaster); and until 1875, practically all of them lived in York, County, Pa."
Vane then added his own note: "The above date is not entirely correct. Some of them left York much earlier. One went to Richmond, Virginia, and a descendant left two daughters. One is reported to have gone to Ohio. John Lowmaster bought his farm in what is now Canoe Township, Indiana County, in 1845."
Vane made no reference to paternal descendants who go by the names Lawmaster, Laumaster, and Loumaster. His focus was on his family, that is, his father and grandfather, as well as his maternal side, the Emericks.
This work was an excellent start for this researcher. It contained a number of ambiguities, for which I am thankful, because it has forced me to search for more and check and double check his sources. And he has still left a lot to ponder as I have yet to explore his statement that "Legend says his (Wendel's) wife was of the House of Von Beulow."
Lowmaster, 1972, by Rev. Vane Lowmaster
Labels:
LOWMASTER
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Help Needed
As much as I try to do this by myself, I need help, especially tracking down the living. At least the dead stay in one place. Usually. Below are names I have found that belong in our family but I have yet to connect them. Please contact me if you know where they fit.
Jacob Laumaster married in Philadelphia to Jane Fenimore of Burlington, NJ on August 26, 1836 (Source: Burlington Gazette)
Donald Louis LOWMASTER 4 Aug 1954 Riverside Co., California Mother: CIDOR
Source: California Birth Records
Lisa Renee Lawmaster - d. 16 Jan 1978, buried Midland Cemetery, Midland MI
Adam Gregory Lawmaster (b. 1983) and Jesse David Lawmaster (b. 1981) - Orange Co., Calif. Mother is Ms. Artle
Alexander Dean Lawmaster (b. 1992 in Gray Co., TX), son/of Bobby Dean Taylor and Elizabeth Lea Lawmaster.
Brittany Nicole Lawmaster (b. 1987, Orange Co., Calif.), unknown father and Ms. Henderson
Melanie Lawmaster (b. ca 1949/50), Tulsa, m. 1992, Kevin Wall
Rachel Kathryn (1994) and Sean Christopher Lawmaster (1992), b. Orange Co., Ms.
Nemechek
Rebecca Jane Lowmaster (b. 1963), m. Kenneth Schott Lettich (1985) and Raymond Alan Palacek
Jacob Laumaster married in Philadelphia to Jane Fenimore of Burlington, NJ on August 26, 1836 (Source: Burlington Gazette)
Donald Louis LOWMASTER 4 Aug 1954 Riverside Co., California Mother: CIDOR
Source: California Birth Records
Lisa Renee Lawmaster - d. 16 Jan 1978, buried Midland Cemetery, Midland MI
Adam Gregory Lawmaster (b. 1983) and Jesse David Lawmaster (b. 1981) - Orange Co., Calif. Mother is Ms. Artle
Alexander Dean Lawmaster (b. 1992 in Gray Co., TX), son/of Bobby Dean Taylor and Elizabeth Lea Lawmaster.
Brittany Nicole Lawmaster (b. 1987, Orange Co., Calif.), unknown father and Ms. Henderson
Melanie Lawmaster (b. ca 1949/50), Tulsa, m. 1992, Kevin Wall
Rachel Kathryn (1994) and Sean Christopher Lawmaster (1992), b. Orange Co., Ms.
Nemechek
Rebecca Jane Lowmaster (b. 1963), m. Kenneth Schott Lettich (1985) and Raymond Alan Palacek
Monday, February 16, 2009
Daniel Wenger, 5th Cousin or So
I had an opportunity to work with the Amgen Tour of California, a professional bike race, February 14-17. My assignment on Monday was Santa Cruz, a coastal town in northern California.
I had corresponded with Daniel Wenger a number of times over the years. Since he lived in Santa Cruz I made a point to alert him to my presence and my assignment (Bay @ Anthony). Ture to schedule, he showed up to say hello but had to leave before the race came through.

Daniel and I are 5th cousins, once removed, through Rev. Christian Wenger and Maria Weaver and through Henry Light, Jr., and Magdalena Funk. And we're also 7th cousins, once removed through Hans (John) Wenger and Ann Shirk. And maybe through two different lines. Not quite sure how that one works. But it was a great to meet another cousin.
I had corresponded with Daniel Wenger a number of times over the years. Since he lived in Santa Cruz I made a point to alert him to my presence and my assignment (Bay @ Anthony). Ture to schedule, he showed up to say hello but had to leave before the race came through.

Barry and Daniel
Daniel and I are 5th cousins, once removed, through Rev. Christian Wenger and Maria Weaver and through Henry Light, Jr., and Magdalena Funk. And we're also 7th cousins, once removed through Hans (John) Wenger and Ann Shirk. And maybe through two different lines. Not quite sure how that one works. But it was a great to meet another cousin.
Labels:
WENGER
Monday, February 9, 2009
More Questions about George
George Lowmaster, the son of Frederick's Laumeister/Laumaster, left York and eventually settled in Indiana Co., Pa. But when did he leave and when did he arrive? And where was he in between?
His son, my third-great-grandfather, John Lowmaster, was born in Va. or Pennsylvania. On the 1860 and 1870 census he was listed as having been born in Virginia. The other census records lists Pennsylvania.
I long suspected that around 1813-14 George and his brother John left York and went down the Shenandoah Valley into Virginia.
I will reformat this...
Record of Geo. Lowmaster - 2 x x x 1 x 2 3 x 1Males under 10 - 2 (Levi, John)10-1616-1816-2626-45 -- 1 (George)45+FemalesUnder 10 - 2 (Catherine, Magdalena)10-16 -- 3 (Rebecca, Mary Ann, Leah)16-2626-45 - 1 (Mary Magdalena)
This also establishes the birth date for the twins. If they were born in 1802 as some researchers and the Indiana (Pa.) Gazette claimed (in 1904), they would have been on this census as 16-26 years old, not in the 10-16 year category.
This record is for the town of Bath, Va. And it all is starting to come together.
Bath is also more commonly known by the post office in the town. Since there already was a Bath, Va. in Bath Co., Virginia, this Bath also went by the name of the post office -- Berkeley Springs. Yes, the same Berkeley Springs which is on Rte 522 about 12 miles south of Hancock, Maryland.
I have to find a reference but I have one to John (brother of George) Lowmaster who was living in Berkeley Co., Virginia. Until 1820, Bath was part of Berkeley Co. Morgan Co wasn';t formed until 1820. This means a new place to look for our Lowmaster ancestors. I always assumed Martinsburg (WV) was their home since that is Berkeley Co. but now it looks like Berkeley Springs is the place.
More to come...
His son, my third-great-grandfather, John Lowmaster, was born in Va. or Pennsylvania. On the 1860 and 1870 census he was listed as having been born in Virginia. The other census records lists Pennsylvania.
I long suspected that around 1813-14 George and his brother John left York and went down the Shenandoah Valley into Virginia.
I will reformat this...
Record of Geo. Lowmaster - 2 x x x 1 x 2 3 x 1Males under 10 - 2 (Levi, John)10-1616-1816-2626-45 -- 1 (George)45+FemalesUnder 10 - 2 (Catherine, Magdalena)10-16 -- 3 (Rebecca, Mary Ann, Leah)16-2626-45 - 1 (Mary Magdalena)
This also establishes the birth date for the twins. If they were born in 1802 as some researchers and the Indiana (Pa.) Gazette claimed (in 1904), they would have been on this census as 16-26 years old, not in the 10-16 year category.
This record is for the town of Bath, Va. And it all is starting to come together.
Bath is also more commonly known by the post office in the town. Since there already was a Bath, Va. in Bath Co., Virginia, this Bath also went by the name of the post office -- Berkeley Springs. Yes, the same Berkeley Springs which is on Rte 522 about 12 miles south of Hancock, Maryland.
I have to find a reference but I have one to John (brother of George) Lowmaster who was living in Berkeley Co., Virginia. Until 1820, Bath was part of Berkeley Co. Morgan Co wasn';t formed until 1820. This means a new place to look for our Lowmaster ancestors. I always assumed Martinsburg (WV) was their home since that is Berkeley Co. but now it looks like Berkeley Springs is the place.
More to come...
Labels:
LOWMASTER
Saturday, February 7, 2009
Seger
My interest in the SEGER line is with Annie Seger, 16 Dec 1854 - 17 Apr 1915, in western Pennsylvania. Annie's full name was Maria Ann Seger. She married Aaron States in 1871.
She is the daughter of Samuel Seger (1822-1889) and Eva Whitaker (1828-1903).
Annie was my grandma's grandma. I have a plate (ceramic?) that belonged to Annie. It was simply marked by my grandmother (my Grandma's plate).
I defer questions of research on this line to Bill Seger of St. George, UT. His email is redhen at infowest dot com (put it all together). Bill is my third cousin once removed (through Samuel Seger). He's also 3c1r thru John Lowmaster, 5c thru John Christopher Rishel, and 4c1r thru George Lowmaster, Sr. I guess we're related many ways.
She is the daughter of Samuel Seger (1822-1889) and Eva Whitaker (1828-1903).
Annie was my grandma's grandma. I have a plate (ceramic?) that belonged to Annie. It was simply marked by my grandmother (my Grandma's plate).
I defer questions of research on this line to Bill Seger of St. George, UT. His email is redhen at infowest dot com (put it all together). Bill is my third cousin once removed (through Samuel Seger). He's also 3c1r thru John Lowmaster, 5c thru John Christopher Rishel, and 4c1r thru George Lowmaster, Sr. I guess we're related many ways.
Friday, February 6, 2009
Who the heck is David Forry Laumaster?
Connecting all these names is much like working on a 500 piece, well, 2,000 piece (sometimes it seems like 10,000 piece) jigsaw puzzle. You trust that you have all the pieces and eventually they all fit. But once in a while you get a strange piece that doesn't seem to fit.
...Yet you know it must...
David Forry Laumaster was born 9 Aug 1884 in York, Pa. A Laumaster from York in the 1880s is enough to establish likely probability that he is from the family of Wendel.
We don't know his father -- only his mother. His mother was Mary L. ________ who was born ca. 1863 and died between 1920 and 1930, probably in Baltimore. We find David, a fireman, living in Baltimore between 1910 and at least 1941. Around 1920, David married Rose T. ________ and apparently did not have children.
Mary remarried Charles Long around 1905.
I had hoped that by 1880 the 17 year old Mary was married to our Laumaster and they would appear on the census but I could not find such a record. The 1890 census, of course, is not available.
Any information would be greatly appreciated
...Yet you know it must...
David Forry Laumaster was born 9 Aug 1884 in York, Pa. A Laumaster from York in the 1880s is enough to establish likely probability that he is from the family of Wendel.
We don't know his father -- only his mother. His mother was Mary L. ________ who was born ca. 1863 and died between 1920 and 1930, probably in Baltimore. We find David, a fireman, living in Baltimore between 1910 and at least 1941. Around 1920, David married Rose T. ________ and apparently did not have children.
Mary remarried Charles Long around 1905.
I had hoped that by 1880 the 17 year old Mary was married to our Laumaster and they would appear on the census but I could not find such a record. The 1890 census, of course, is not available.
Any information would be greatly appreciated
Labels:
LAUMASTER
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Social Security Death Index
Believe it or not, it is often easier to get information from the dead than from the living. Much of my research is concentrated on death and cemetery records, census records, and the Social Security Death Index (SSDI). I'm using the SSDI to support my theory that all of us have ancestors whose records are now in the SSDI. If I can link everyone named L__master in the SSDI as being related, it's highly unlikely there are those living with the name who aren't related to us. As of January 14, 2009, I have linked all 93 Lowmasters in the SSDI. There are eight Loumasters; all connected. There are 45 Lawmasters and I have connected 43 of them. I am still working on the remaining two. I will admit, I'm not sure where those two fit in.
UPDATE 1/22/09: There are six Laumasters in the SSDI of which I connected two. I must add these to the list and bring them into the fold as well.
UPDATE 1/22/09: There are six Laumasters in the SSDI of which I connected two. I must add these to the list and bring them into the fold as well.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Worst Family History Book Ever
In 2001, my uncle, Lloyd Lowmaster, spent $40 on a book called The Y2K Lowmaster Family Yearbook. I absolutely hate to see people ripped off.
UPDATE --- FEB 9, 2006: The Colorado State Attorney General reached a settlement with Morphcorp for deceptive advertising. Details here.
Other user experiences are listed here as well:
Eastman's Online Genealogy Newsletter
Genealogy.com GenForum
The Lowmaster Y2K Family Yearbook is one of the most poorly written and researched histories and yearbook that I have even seen. I thought the company in Bath, Ohio, which promised a family history was the worst, but with the advent of computers for ease of printing and the Internet for ease of gathering information, people and companies use these methods to make a cheap product for the unsuspecting.
The inside cover page shows a picture of a family of seven, presumably a Lowmaster family, however there is no identification as to this family and the authors were wise not to try and pass these people off as Lowmasters.
They claim it is published by the Lowmaster Family News, a company that doesn't exist. The second page claims “My wife and I have been researching the Lowmaster family (and other related families), genealogy and history since 1986.
“We would like to thanks (sic) the reader of the Lowmaster Family news who sent in piles of family information which made the publication of this work possible.
“This Crest is a graphic artist’s interpretation of the Lowmaster Crest. Its (sic) of greater value as a work of art, then (sic) as a genealogical or historical document.”
Spelling and grammatical mistakes abound on this page. Certainly this is not a professional effort by anyone.
No one sent “piles of information” and I can demonstrate exactly where all their information comes from.
The Lowmaster Longevity Records
This section is not a section on longevity but merely a filler to take up space and create the illusion of research. This information is readily available, for free, from a variety of sources, all of which come from the public records of the Social Security Death Index.
Certainly, if one were to include longevity records, they would have to include those who have lived 99+ years and are still living, however, this information only known to true researchers of the family.
Lowmaster Baby Name Records
This section is not a section of baby names at all and the dubious claim that they researched these for naming their children is preposterous. Using the same Social Security Death Index, they merely arranged those names and added a count to them.
Lowmaster Book of Locations
This section is nothing more than a search of public records (i.e, telephone records) with a total by state.
Lowmaster Marriage Records
One record? Need I say more?
Lowmaster Birth Records
This section is merely the birth portion of what is contained in the SSDI. The index does not contain the location of the birth but the state that issued the Social Security Number. Thus the state is not necessarily the birth place and this book listed Virgin Islands where Virginia should be.
The Lowmaster Book of Deaths
This section is the death portion of what is contained in the SSDI. However, this section is full of errors. By my count only 16 of the 61 records are accurate. The reason is that most death records in the SSDI only contain month and year but not day. This book chose to fabricate death dates merely by making them the 15th of the month. In addition, they listed some people named LOMAX in this section.
The Lowmaster Book of Residents
A public search of phone records will result in this section.
The Lowmaster Census Book
There are very few records listed here. True researchers have at their disposal census records through 1920. This appears to have been lifted from a search of census records.
The Lowmaster Phone Book
Same as the book of residents, only this time the phone number has been left in.
Lowmaster Cousin Records
Lowmax is not a relative to Lowmaster. Lawmaster, Laumeister, Laumaster, and Loumaster are.
Lowmaster Believe it or Not!
This section is mostly a listing of business under the Lowmaster name.
The Lowmaster Jokebook
An insult to research.
The History of the Lowmaster Family
This is a joke. Contrary to the history, there are no Lowmasters in the International Genealogical Index (IGI) from the 17th century. There are no listings for Lowmaster in "virtually every European country." This “history” is written to be so generic that it applies to any family, such as Smith or Jones, but we know the derivation of the Lowmaster name and it didn’t start in Europe. It was an Americanization of the German “Laumeister.” And further, Christopher Columbus did not show up in 1942, my history teaches it was 1492.
My years of research do tie together everyone named Lowmaster. And Lawmaster. And Loumaster. I hate to see people falling for such hoaxes as this work. -- Barry Sherry
UPDATE --- FEB 9, 2006: The Colorado State Attorney General reached a settlement with Morphcorp for deceptive advertising. Details here.
Other user experiences are listed here as well:
Eastman's Online Genealogy Newsletter
Genealogy.com GenForum
The Lowmaster Y2K Family Yearbook is one of the most poorly written and researched histories and yearbook that I have even seen. I thought the company in Bath, Ohio, which promised a family history was the worst, but with the advent of computers for ease of printing and the Internet for ease of gathering information, people and companies use these methods to make a cheap product for the unsuspecting.
The inside cover page shows a picture of a family of seven, presumably a Lowmaster family, however there is no identification as to this family and the authors were wise not to try and pass these people off as Lowmasters.
They claim it is published by the Lowmaster Family News, a company that doesn't exist. The second page claims “My wife and I have been researching the Lowmaster family (and other related families), genealogy and history since 1986.
“We would like to thanks (sic) the reader of the Lowmaster Family news who sent in piles of family information which made the publication of this work possible.
“This Crest is a graphic artist’s interpretation of the Lowmaster Crest. Its (sic) of greater value as a work of art, then (sic) as a genealogical or historical document.”
Spelling and grammatical mistakes abound on this page. Certainly this is not a professional effort by anyone.
No one sent “piles of information” and I can demonstrate exactly where all their information comes from.
The Lowmaster Longevity Records
This section is not a section on longevity but merely a filler to take up space and create the illusion of research. This information is readily available, for free, from a variety of sources, all of which come from the public records of the Social Security Death Index.
Certainly, if one were to include longevity records, they would have to include those who have lived 99+ years and are still living, however, this information only known to true researchers of the family.
Lowmaster Baby Name Records
This section is not a section of baby names at all and the dubious claim that they researched these for naming their children is preposterous. Using the same Social Security Death Index, they merely arranged those names and added a count to them.
Lowmaster Book of Locations
This section is nothing more than a search of public records (i.e, telephone records) with a total by state.
Lowmaster Marriage Records
One record? Need I say more?
Lowmaster Birth Records
This section is merely the birth portion of what is contained in the SSDI. The index does not contain the location of the birth but the state that issued the Social Security Number. Thus the state is not necessarily the birth place and this book listed Virgin Islands where Virginia should be.
The Lowmaster Book of Deaths
This section is the death portion of what is contained in the SSDI. However, this section is full of errors. By my count only 16 of the 61 records are accurate. The reason is that most death records in the SSDI only contain month and year but not day. This book chose to fabricate death dates merely by making them the 15th of the month. In addition, they listed some people named LOMAX in this section.
The Lowmaster Book of Residents
A public search of phone records will result in this section.
The Lowmaster Census Book
There are very few records listed here. True researchers have at their disposal census records through 1920. This appears to have been lifted from a search of census records.
The Lowmaster Phone Book
Same as the book of residents, only this time the phone number has been left in.
Lowmaster Cousin Records
Lowmax is not a relative to Lowmaster. Lawmaster, Laumeister, Laumaster, and Loumaster are.
Lowmaster Believe it or Not!
This section is mostly a listing of business under the Lowmaster name.
The Lowmaster Jokebook
An insult to research.
The History of the Lowmaster Family
This is a joke. Contrary to the history, there are no Lowmasters in the International Genealogical Index (IGI) from the 17th century. There are no listings for Lowmaster in "virtually every European country." This “history” is written to be so generic that it applies to any family, such as Smith or Jones, but we know the derivation of the Lowmaster name and it didn’t start in Europe. It was an Americanization of the German “Laumeister.” And further, Christopher Columbus did not show up in 1942, my history teaches it was 1492.
My years of research do tie together everyone named Lowmaster. And Lawmaster. And Loumaster. I hate to see people falling for such hoaxes as this work. -- Barry Sherry
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


















